Posted on November 19, 2010 in DUI

LATEST UPDATE ON IID-RESTRICTED LICENSES: The DMV has now lost two separate lawsuits in Marin and Orange Counties based on its refusal to grant IID-restricted license (ignition interlock devices) to second-time DUI offenders with violation dates earlier than July 1, 2010, but with conviction dates subsequent to said date. A third lawsuit is reportedly now pending in Monterey County, wherein both the violation and conviction dates are prior to July 1, 2010. Notwithstanding the two losses, the DMV has yet to reverse its policy and will soon face additional lawsuits that include claims for attorney fees based on its arbitrary and capricious conduct. Clearly, the DMV is thumbing its nose at both the Legislature and the Courts, insisting upon a course of action that defies the legislative goal of encouraging DUI offenders to install ignition interlock devices in their vehicles. If you are a second or third time DUI offender interested in obtaining an IID-restricted license, contact San Francisco DUI attorney Paul Burglin today at (415) 453-0534.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on October 30, 2010 in DUI

Mann County Superior Court Judge Verna A. Adams ruled in favor of a California man seeking the reinstatement of his driver’s lice nse following a second offense DUI conviction under law that went into effect on July 1, 2010. (client name redacted to preserve confidentiality)

40-year-old (name removed for confidentiality) was convicted of a second offense DUI on July 15, 2010, following his arrest on February 23, 2010. After having served 90 days of a license suspension, (name removed for confidentiality) sought the reinstatement of his license subject to his installing an ignition-interlock device (IID) in his vehicle. The IID prevents the operation of a vehicle if the driver has been drinking.

The DMV rejected (name removed for confidentiality) application for an IID-restricted license, contending that the new law does not apply to offenders with violation dates earlier than July 1, 2010. Finding that the legislative intent of the new law was to encourage all multiple offenders to install an IID in their car, Judge Adams ordered the DMV to grant (name removed for confidentiality) an IID ­restricted license.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on July 15, 2010 in DUI

Have you been charged with a DUI San Francisco, DUI Marin, DUI Sonoma or DUI Napa ? My name is Paul Burglin and I am a San Francisco Bay area DUI defense attorney who for over 25 years has specialized in drunk driving defense in San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Napa and surrounding communities. I am also the co-author of "California Drunk Driving Law".

In this series of blog postings I am going to discuss search and seizure issues related to drunk driving cases. However, the totality of search and seizure law is perhaps as voluminous and complicated as drunk driving (DUI) law.

Hot Pursuit

Several California decisions have upheld the warrantless arrest of a DUI suspect where the act of driving was observed by the police and they entered his residence in “hot pursuit." See People v. Hampton (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 27 (A short time after the arresting officer told the defendant not to drive, he saw a car like hers pull into her garage. He feared that she would drive again, having once done so after being warned); and People v. Lavoyne L.M. (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 154 (arrest in the defendant’s home for traffic infractions and driving without a license followed a hot pursuit that began in a public place).

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on July 07, 2010 in DUI

If you were arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence over the Fourth of July weekend you are not alone.  The California Highway Patrol reports that it arrested 128 drivers in the Bay Area for this alleged offense over the weekend, and that figure does not include arrests made by deputy sheriffs and city police officers.

If you desire legal representation to navigate and defend you through the DMV and Court systems, please give my office a call or send me an e-mail message.  It is unwise to try and handle these situations yourself.  I have been a San Francisco DUI lawyer for over 25 years and if I cannot get you off, I can at least mitigate things for you as much as possible.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on July 02, 2010 in DUI

Have you been charged with a DUI San Francisco, DUI Marin, DUI Sonoma or DUI Napa? My name is Paul Burglin and I am a San Francisco Bay area drunk driving attorney who for over 25 years has specialized in drunk driving defense in San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Napa and surrounding communities. I am also the co-author of "California Drunk Driving Law".

New DUI laws go into effect on July 1, 2010, pertaining to restricted license eligibility for multiple offenders. 

Summary Of New Restricted License Laws For Multiple Offenders- SB 598 and 895 (effective July 1, 2010)

New IID Restricted License Laws - SB 598 and 895 (effective July 1, 2010)

CVC § 13352(a)(3) = IID restricted license available to second-time offenders convicted of 23152(a) or (b) after 90 days, unless defendant was found by Court to be under the influence of a drug.  Credit given for APS suspension time.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on June 29, 2010 in DUI

Have you been charged with a DUI San Francisco, DUI Marin, DUI Sonoma or DUI Napa? My name is Paul Burglin and I am a San Francisco Bay area drunk driving attorney who for over 25 years has specialized in drunk driving defense in San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Napa and surrounding communities. I am also the co-author of "California Drunk Driving Law".

In this series of blog postings I am going to discuss search and seizure issues related to drunk driving cases. However, the totality of search and seizure law is perhaps as voluminous and complicated as drunk driving (DUI) law.

Today's Post: DETENTION AND ARREST | Seizure of a Person | Entry of Dwelling Without a Warrant |Consent

The warrantless entry into a home to arrest someone is an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution absent probable cause and an exigent circumstance. Payton v. New York (1980) 445 U.S. 573, 589-590. Thus, absent some exception to the warrant requirement, if there is time for the constable to obtain a warrant then it must be obtained. The following discussion concerns various exceptions to the warrant requirement.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on June 16, 2010 in DUI

Have you been charged with a DUI San Francisco, DUI Marin, DUI Sonoma or DUI Napa? My name is Paul Burglin and I am a San Francisco Bay area drunk driving attorney who for over 25 years has specialized in drunk driving defense in San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Napa and surrounding communities. I am also the co-author of "California Drunk Driving Law".

In this series of blog postings I am going to discuss search and seizure issues related to drunk driving cases. However, the totality of search and seizure law is perhaps as voluminous and complicated as drunk driving (DUI) law.

Today's Post: DETENTION AND ARREST | Seizure of a Person | Entry of Dwelling Without a Warrant

The warrantless entry into a home to arrest someone is an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution absent probable cause and an exigent circumstance. Payton v. New York (1980) 445 U.S. 573, 589-590. Thus, absent some exception to the warrant requirement, if there is time for the constable to obtain a warrant then it must be obtained. Furthermore, curtilage around a dwelling is given the same protection. People v. Strider (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1393 affirmed that locations where the general public is not permitted to walk without challenge, such as a fenced-in yard, are protected. The following discussion concerns various exceptions to the warrant requirement.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on June 11, 2010 in DUI

Have you been charged with a DUI San Francisco, DUI Marin, DUI Sonoma or DUI Napa? My name is Paul Burglin and I am a San Francisco Bay area drunk driving attorney who for over 25 years has specialized in drunk driving defense in San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Napa and surrounding communities. I am also the co-author of "California Drunk Driving Law".

SCRAM bracelets - They can be helpful for both defendant and the public

The latest brouhaha over Lindsay Lohan's alleged probation violation is generating favorable publicity for Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc., and its state of the art ankle bracelets for alcohol detection. Not only do the devices trigger an immediate report of alcohol use, but they provide sufficiently detailed information to purportedly distinguish mere alcohol "alerts" from actual "drinking events" - the former may be caused by something as innocuous as hairspray containing alcohol, whereas the latter involves actual consumption of an alcoholic beverage.

The helpful thing about these devices for DUI defendants is that defense counsel can more persuasively argue that pre-trial release presents no real risk to the public because alcohol use will be immediately reported to the Court. The public benefits because county jails remain less crowded and defendants pay for their own bracelet.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on June 08, 2010 in DUI

Have you been charged with a DUI San Francisco, DUI Marin, DUI Sonoma or DUI Napa? My name is Paul Burglin and I am a San Francisco Bay area drunk driving attorney who for over 25 years has specialized in drunk driving defense in San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Napa and surrounding communities. I am also the co-author of "California Drunk Driving Law".

In this series of blog postings I am going to discuss search and seizure issues related to drunk driving cases. However, the totality of search and seizure law is perhaps as voluminous and complicated as drunk driving (DUI) law.  

Today's Post: DETENTION AND ARREST | Seizure of a Person | Prolonged Detention Waiting for DUI Expert Cop

Occasionally, the defendant will be detained without probable cause for an arrest while a special drunk driving expert is called to administer field sobriety tests. For instance, some sheriff's deputies routinely summon and await the arrival of a CHP officer for this purpose. If the delay until the expert arrives is too long, the extended detention without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on May 27, 2010 in DUI

More problems are surfacing with the San Francisco district attorney's office for not disclosing the background of a prosecution witness who testified in drunk driving cases.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, a supervising toxicologist vouched for the reliability of alcohol detection equipment in blood test results in DUI cases for two years in a Washington State lab. She signed off on the cases even though she had not tested the equipment herself. 

Hundreds of criminal convictions in San Francisco are already at risk because prosecutors withheld police officers' criminal histories or misconduct records from defense attorneys.  

My position on this is that it underscores now more than ever that defense counsel is needed for San Francisco DUI cases, as the District Attorney is now fighting pressure to dismiss cases following exposure of the crime lab problems!

Continue Reading ››